Based on the self-appraisal sample forms provided by the SET or those disseminated by other regulators, the Committee will prepare the appraisal forms by making improvements to the sample forms, ensuring that the final ones are appropriate and in line with the nature of each committee in all aspects. In appraising the performance of the whole Board of Director, the appraisal covers six key areas including: 1) structure and qualifications of the Board of Directors, 2) roles, duties, and responsibilities of the Board of Directors, 3) the meetings of the Board of Directors, 4) the Board of Directors’ performance of duties, 5) the Board of Directors’ relationship with management, and 6) Self-development of the Board of Directors as well as development of executives. In appraising the performance of each Director, the appraisal covers three key areas including: 1) the structure and qualifications of the Board of Directors, 2) meetings of the Board of Directors, and 3) roles, duties and responsibilities of the Board of Directors. The related assessment scores range from 0 (strongly disagree or never conducted) to 4 (strongly agree of excellently conducted). 2. Appraisal Processes The Nomination, Remuneration, and Corporate Governance Committee will consider and review the performance appraisal forms of the Board of Directors, both as a group and as an individual prior to submission of the forms to the Board of Directors for consideration and review on an annual basis. The company secretary will then upload the performance appraisal forms into Diligent Boards system in December and January every year. The company secretary will be responsible for collecting and summarizing the appraisal results, which will be submitted to the Nomination, Remuneration, and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors for acknowledgement and consideration. The Board of Directors will evaluate the performance results, as well as various recommendations and observations, ensuring that they will be implemented appropriately, also in line with the business environment and the business operations. 3. Appraisal Result Summary The details related to the appraisal of the Board of Directors’ performance in 2021 were as follows 1) The average performance appraisal score of the Board of Directors as a whole was 3.92 or 98.04 percent. 2) The average performance appraisal score of the Board of Directors on an individual basis was 3.89 or 97.22 percent. Appraisal of Sub-committees’ Performance In 2021, the Company made arrangements for the performance appraisal of the sub-committee including the Audit Committee, the Nomination, Remuneration, and Corporate Governance Committee, the Executive Committee, and the Risk Oversight Committee. In this connection, the related performance appraisal form will be reviewed by each Standing Committee annually and presented to the Nomination, Remuneration, and Corporate Governance Committee for consideration and acknowledgement in line with not only the Committee’s roles and responsibilities but also the principle of governance. Members of each Standing Committee will conduct the performance appraisal in Diligent Board system, taking into consideration the overall performance of their respective Committee’s duties. The secretary of each Standing Committee will collect the appraisal results and present them to the respective Standing 180
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy ODEyMzQ3